Poet,
Dean Blehert
(born in St. Paul, MN, in 1942), taught literature and creative
writing for two years at Cornell University. He left academia
in 1969, since which his jobs have ranged from cab driver
to professional counselor to computer programmer and, primarily,
a poet--since 1991 his full-time activity.
Dean Blehert has had seven poetry books published, most recently
Kill the Children and Other Disconnections (Argonne House
Press, 2001) and Please, Lord, Make Me a Famous Poet or at
Least Less Fat, a 400-page mock textbook full of parody and
satire on the poetry scene, past and current. He also publishes
his own subscription poetry letter, Deanotations (Dean's poems
with his wife's drawings) which has come out every two months
since August, 1984. Currently Deanotations has about 300 paid
subscribers, and has often been praised for its quirky viewpoints
and slightly offbeat humor.
Deanotations has readers in most of the 50 states and in
Canada, England, Germany, Israel and Australia. He's had poems
published or accepted for publication in New York Quarterly,
Kansas Quarterly Review, Crosscurrents, Bogg, Visions, Lip
Service, Gold Dust, Dark Horse, Modern Haiku, Carousel, Light,
The Lyric, Krax, Orphic Lute, Brussel Sprouts, Stroker, Implosion,
Haiku Headlines, Reston Review, Carousel, View From The Loft,
The Listening Eye, Gyst, Plains Poetry Journal, Minimus, Potomac
Review and many others. Issue 55 of New York Quarterly ran
his article, "Shrink-rapt Poetry", in its State
of Poetry in America series. He's been featured at readings
in Calif., New York, D.C., Texas, Maryland, Florida, Arkansas,
New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Minnesota,
Tennessee, Illinois, Iowa and Virginia. He lives with his
wife, Pam, a painter, in Reston, Virginia.
A recent review of "Deanotations" in KRAX (a literary
magazine from England) said:
Every two months Dean does a large broadsheet of his own
poems; these range from punning two-liners, clerihews, pithy
homilies to eight or nine stanza witty cynicisms. Some poets
would take five years to produce stuff up to the standard
of one of these. I don't know how he keeps it going.... On
the writing level alone -let alone producing and mailing the
thing. Sure there are some corny bits but I don't think he
has time to stop for bad days! Who could you read monthly
and still want more? This is marathon man standard.
He's had poems published or accepted for publication in New
York Quarterly, Kansas Quarterly Review, Crosscurrents, Bogg,
Visions, Lip Service, Gold Dust, Dark Horse, Modern Haiku,
Carousel, Light, The Lyric, Krax, Orphic Lute, Brussel Sprouts,
Stroker, Implosion, Haiku Headlines, Reston Review, Carousel,
View From The Loft, The Listening Eye, Gyst, Plains Poetry
Journal, Minimus, Potomac Review, Mandrake, Daybreak, Pivot
and many others. Issue 55 of New York Quarterly ran his article,
"Shrink-rapt Poetry", in its State of Poetry in
America series.
He's been featured at readings in Calif., New York, D.C.,
Texas, Minnesota, Iowa, Illinois, Florida, Maryland, Washington
and virginia and has read his works to classes in several
D.C.-area high schools and colleges.
Comments on his latest book:
"Dean Blehert is a radical innovator in contemporary
poetry. He has discovered pleasure. His poems are - how contrarian
- both fun to read and wonderfully perceptive about the follies
of modern life. I hope he represents the cutting edge of poetry
for the new millennium. But if not, we can console ourselves
by rereading him." Dana Gioia [Note: Dana Gioia is a
nationally known poet and a leader of the formalist movement
in poetry.]
"Dean Blehert... is quite simply the finest satiric
poet working in America today." Satire Magazine
"What a banquet!! -- a feast of wit, wild and wonderful
incredibly clever!" Lyn Lifshin [Note: Lyn is the most
published living poet in the United States.]
"Dean Blehert is a provocateur of poetry and poets.
He plays the Devil's Advocate to expose tedium and cant. He
is doing what every modern poet should be doing -- publishing
themselves, distributing their work successfully, and earning
a living as a modern poet." Thom the World Poet [Note:
Thom is a modern troubadour-poet and one of the founder of
the annual Austin International Poetry Festival.]
"Blehert's Poe Parody is one of the most brilliant and
hilarious spoofs I've ever seen. I laughed my ass off, and
read it over the phone to a girl I was about to marry. When
she didn't laugh, I knew the relationship was doomed. Sure
enough, a short while later..." Peter Ludwin [a much-published
Seattle poet]
What follows is a somewhat more casual and rambling account
of himself. It is included here for those who would like a
more complete account.
I suppose I "began" writing, but it seems to me
I've always been a writer - or at least always looking about
at things and wanting to say something clever or otherwise
interesting about them - and have the adults express amazement,
the other kids laugh, etc. At age 7 I began to focus more
on writing after the shock of discovering that reading could
open up worlds of pleasure.
I learned to read early (pre-school) and liked it, mildly,
but was surprised one day when I picked up a Hardy Boys novel
to find "real" stories and characters as entertaining
as the bang-bang radio shows to which I'd been addicted since
about age 4. Not long after, (maybe age 8) I tried to write
my own Hardy Boys novel - got about 8 pages into it and gave
up. I was impressed - wanted to give others what these books
gave me.
Around age 8 or 9, I was home sick, and my Dad brought me
three comics, one of which was a "Classic" comic
(The Corsican Brothers), which I found delightful - read it
over and over. (Among other things, it contained the novelty
for a Hardy Boys fan, that one of the good guys gets killed
- the noble sadness hooked me. Somehow I figured out that
this comic and all the other titles listed on the back were
BOOKS and began to seek them out in the Public Library, finding
War and Peace still too much for me, but Robin Hood and The
Three Musketeers exciting. (Oddly enough, I've never read
The Corsican Brothers - except in comic book form. Maybe I
didn't want to be disappointed.)
In short, I became a voracious reader and, increasingly,
wanted to do what these writers did. Later I came under the
spells of Tolstoy, James Joyce, Kafka, Nabokov and other "heavyweights",
and widened my ambitions.
Note that my ambitions were sparked by novels - yet nearly
all my writing consists of poems. That's partly laziness:
I didn't feel I knew enough to write a novel. I'd sit down
to write and find myself writing (what passes for) poetry.
A bit of mystery there: I'm not lazy (I've written good sestinas,
for example - not a lazy artist's choice), nor do I lack attention
span. And I love a good story. Perhaps I'm impatient: prefer
to speak for myself, not via character or situation. Perhaps
I'm more infatuated with the rhythms of speech than with characterization.
All I know is that in the past 40 years I've written about
35,000 poems and no novels (and only 2 or 3 stories). My own
reading of choice is NOT poetry. I'd rather read a good mystery
story than any poem ever written, with the possible exception
of Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra or King Lear, both of
which I enjoy more as poetry on the page than as dramatic
performances.
But I write...poetry. (Though opinions vary.)
As for having a specific reason for writing each book - no.
I don't write books. I write poems and later organize them
into books based on theme, tone, what others have enjoyed,
etc.
Authors:
For many years (approx. ages 15 though 30) I read in a sort
of fervor, seeking out universes large enough and rich enough
to live in. I'd find someone "GREAT" and read no
one else for months, finding all others too inferior (in comparison)
to be worth the bother. The authors who enchanted me in this
way (all of whom I still admire greatly) include Tolstoy,
James Joyce, Kafka, Shakespeare, Nabokov, Boswell/Sam Johnson,
Jane Austen, D. H. Lawrence and Biely. Oh - and Walt Kelly
(do cartoonists count? Wordy ones should.)
In those years, I had nothing but disdain for authors who
didn't live up to my adored standards. For example, after
reading and rereading Tolstoy, I found Hemingway a claustrophobic
experience. Conrad, James, Faulkner, Thomas Mann and many
other icons of the academic circuit suffered similarly. I
made myself read them, but found reasons to dislike them.
(I'd probably give them kinder attention now. I browsed through
some Hemingway recently and thought "Not so bad"
- to my surprise.) After initial distaste, I enjoyed Proust
and Dostoyevski. It's hard for a Tolstoy fan to enjoy Dostoyevski
- so many friends, hearing "Tolstoy" - immediately
respond, "Oh, but Dostoyevski is so much more passionate!"
At around age 30, I lightened up. About that time, I became
more tolerant of congenial companionship, with less insistence
that any book I read offer all the answers or the plenitude
of a universe comparable to the agreed-upon universe we share.
I began reading (as I had at age 13) everything: James Bond,
Perry Mason, Miss Marple, Sci. Fi. classics, etc. Gradually
I focused on authors who pleased me most, and they constitute
most of my current reading, among them Sue Grafton, Ed McBain,
Elmore Leonard, Lisa Cody, Tony Hillerman, Dick Francis, James
Ellroy, Michael Lewin, Robert Parker, Patrick O'Brian, Louis
Lamour, Erle Stanley Gardner, Raymond Chandler, Dashiell Hammett,
Dorothy Sayers. These "genre" writers (mostly mystery)
seem to me the secret classics of the century - a few not
so secret.
When I pick up the "literature" of our time, I
find it hard to get into - brilliant much ado. Or maybe I
AM lazy. Now and then something "heavy" comes my
way, and I read it dutifully, a bit of Atwood, for example.
And I recently found Musil's Man Without Qualities - as much
of it as I've gotten through - a remarkable work. But I'll
set it aside instantly at sight of the next Sue Grafton.
Other than novels, I read bits of everything. As a poet,
I feel it a duty to read poetry, but it is seldom a pleasure
(most so when I read poems by personal friends - maybe my
friends are the best poets?). My own poetry is not very "poetic",
relies more on humor and wit than is fashionable, and lacks
a certain murky aura that seems indispensable in award-winning
poetry. My favorite poets are Shakespeare (in his plays),
George Herbert, John Donne, Andrew Marvell, Pope, Swift, Kipling,
Gerard Manley Hopkins, Emily Dickinson, Auden, Yeats, Frost
- the usual suspects (except Kipling) for someone who read
most intensely in his early '60's college days. Browning can
be fun. Oh yes, I love Chaucer. Add D. H. Lawrence, Whitman
and John Shade. Also Bukowski. Of current authors, I enjoy
Lyn Lifshin, Miles David Moore, Hilary Tham, Russell Salamon,
David Ross (died in 1994), Peter Ludwin, Alice Pero, Michael
Schaffner, Shirley Windward, Celia Brown, Thom The World Poet
- all people I know, perhaps a factor?
Among philosophers, I like Wittgenstein and, especially, L.
Ron Hubbard, who writes a mean story, too.
Who has influenced my own writing? I have no idea. No doubt
all of the above.
Mundane details of writing:
I don't work on a schedule. I write when I feel like it,
which is often, and when I've cleared away other tasks (like
cleaning the cat box and answering mail). Sometimes I grab
a nearby notebook (or take one with me for a walk) and write
in it. Other times I sit down at the computer to write and
revise. Sometimes I write at poetry readings while listening
to other poets - maybe in answer to what I hear. Sometimes
I jot a note for a poem in a notebook, then work it out on
the computer. I can write any time, any where. this was not
always the case. I was much more sensitive to distractions
in my college days, for example, and depended more upon "inspiration",
by which I meant, not an idea, but a certain airy exalted
feeling accompanied by a rush of words and ideas, 8 or 10
poems flowing off the pen or flooding my mind as I walked
among trees and houses. Such exaltation would occur about
every four months, then peter out in bad puns and abortive
efforts. Then for months I'd "have nothing to say".
Later I learned to create "inspiration", to be in
charge of it.
I think the key is to be in good communication with others.
It's not "something to say", but OTHERS TO SAY IT
TO. You meet the "one" who can understand, who really
listens and empathizes, and suddenly discover that you have
a great deal to say and can say it with more eloquence and
wit than you knew you had. If a writer keeps his communication
lines to others open and clean, it is easier for him at any
time to direct his writing to such a reader (imagined, postulated).
More simply, art is high quality communication, and in any
communication, the least important element is the particle
sent across from one to another. Other elements are far more
important to the quality of the communication: Someone really
there and communicating as himself with strong positive intention
to reach another and create an understanding - the components
of "inspiration".
I often meet my readers at book signings and other poetry
readings, I interact with them through e-mail, and a sampling
of my poems and essays are available to readers on a web-site,
http://members.aol.com/blehert, along with paintings by my
wife, Pam Coulter Blehert. Also, Pam and I put out a bi-monthly
poetry letter containing my poetry and humor (with her illustrations),
which goes out to hundreds of subscribers for $10/year ($5
for students). We've published this since 1984 (89 issues
so far). A free sample issue is available on our web site
or by sending SASE to Dean Blehert, 11919 Moss Point Lane,
Reston, VA 20194.
I haven't done much with the Net yet. I used to be "technical"
(a programmer, a network consultant), but have gotten very
rusty. Fortunately, my wife, who used to be technically challenged,
has become a guru - installed all the latest, created our
Web page, etc. I've done a bit of research on the Web, but
generally would rather read books. I don't much care for computer
screens - prefer paper (sorry, trees). I do use e-mail more
and more. As for on-line forums - never touch the stuff. I
suppose I'll resist it, then deign to have a look and become
desperately addicted.
I was born in St. Paul, MN, 1942 (Apr. 4. Wife's birthday
is Apr. 5. We married on Apr. 3. April has the cruelest mouth.)
Went to U. of Minn. - majored (double) in English and math,
4 years grad. school at Stanford (picked up an MA more or
less incidentally while working on Ph.D. on "The Involuted
Novel" - focused on Nabokov, Kafka, Borges, Robbe-Grillet,
Melville, Becket, L. Sterne. Never finished the thesis. While
still working on it, I was an Assistant Prof. at Cornell U.,
1967-'69. Dropped out of Academia at end of '69, mainly because
in summer of 1968 I found other things I preferred to do (details
on request, see address above).
Since that time I've been a poet, a cab driver, a professional
counselor, a courier service, a programmer, a consultant (helping
research and write responses on federal procurements of computers)
and...a poet. For a few years ('71-'73) I was crew aboard
a ship with ports in Europe and North Africa - interesting
time. I've lived in Minnesota, Northern Calif., New York (upstate
and NY City), L.A., the D.C. area and the Tampa, FL area.
I love movies, would probably love pop music if the Beatles
were still putting out albums, love Bach, Beethoven and Bartok,
do lots of crossword puzzles, like to go for walks, talk,
make love, write, eat, perform (even won a couple of DC poetry
slams with my rather low-key poetry), travel. I find victims
and beautiful sadness boring, drugs worse than unnecessary
(including most of those prescribed - and ALL psychotropic
drugs) and psychiatry (the field, not necessarily each individual
in it) a "discipline" which, if surgically removed
from the legal, educational and cultural institutions of our
time, would lead to a remarkable recovery. (An article of
mine on the subject appeared in issue 55 of The New York Quarterly.)
I think we are unlimited, immortal spiritual beings capable
of being much more than these flesh machines and that art
is how we play and create games to play.
|